Shotcut: So good that it seems to be a paid program. And what are my impressions? Next, I'll tell you. There was even a post on the forum about this.īut in the latest versions, all problems have been resolved, and, Shotcut now works as it should. Shotcut did not work on PCLinuxOS, which prevented me from using it. It did not crash, was stable and did not consume too many machine resources (Openshot, working, is a resource hog).īut, not everything was rosy: When it came to exporting projects, nothing happened. I was overwhelmed by the program: elegant, made with the Qt libraries, in C ++, the program was smooth as silk running. This I do not recommend to anyone who is starting, because the experience is for professionals, not well-intentioned amateurs. In the meantime, I tested other video editors: Flowblade, Pitivi, even Cinelerra. Shotcut: An excellent NLVE editor, but it took too long. In a way, Openshot is a Windows Movie Maker that rocked the gym, and now has very well defined muscles and a lot of strength in its punches. Openshot really took a lot of inspiration from Windows Movie Maker. So, I passed on KDEnlive, and, I think Openshot, with its strengths and weaknesses, will be the standard by which I'll judge other video editing programs. I was never able to understand that interface, and I think a user should not fight with an application, but work with it. I confess: The KDEnlive interface, which copies Adobe Premiere, scared me away. VSDC also has a very clear and straightforward interface, and its resources are accessible through MS Office ribbon-style menus (now a well spread paradigm among several applications). Then I started using VSDC, from the Windows platform, but thanks to Wine and Play-On_Linux, working perfectly on Linux, to add more effects and other capabilities with characters and fonts that Openshot doesn't have. But, it shows the intelligence of the programmer, who decided not to scare his would be users with an intimidating interface. It has features that are not accessible right from the start, having to be activated, either through different menus or video clip properties. In fact, Openshot is simple, but very complete. Openshot was my choice because it has a direct interface and is super simple to operate. I started making videos for YouTube, with PCLinuxOS, first with Openshot and all the tools that are available in PCLinuxOS repos: Audacity, Openshot, Rezsound, SSR and others. But first, I would like to disclose my background with audio-visual production. Shotcut is a non-linear video editor, which I always wanted to use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |